FractaLPK Drug Dictionary

Public database of fractional pharmacokinetic analysis for validated compounds

Propofol
IV AnestheticIntravenousAdults
Classical Model
Compartments: 2
OFV: 1,247.8
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.72
OFV: 1,068.5
ΔOFV +179.3 ★★★★★ p < 0.0001
Strong anomalous diffusion detected. Classical 2-compartment model significantly underestimates inter-individual variability in propofol distribution kinetics.
Anakinra
IL-1 Receptor AntagonistSubcutaneousAdults
Classical Model
Compartments: 1
OFV: baseline
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.85
OFV: baseline − 13.7
ΔOFV +13.7 ★★★★ p = 0.0002
Significant fractional behavior in subcutaneous absorption. Moderate anomalous diffusion detected. The SC absorption depot benefits from Mittag-Leffler kinetics over first-order.
Abacavir
Antiretroviral (NRTI)OralN=169 children, 2109 obs
Classical Model
Compartments: 1
OFV: 653.6
Fractal Model
nfrac: ~1.000 (mean)
OFV: 311.5
Range: [0.518 – 2.348]
ΔOFV +342 ★★★★★ p < 0.0001 40.2% anomalous
40.2% of children (68/169) show anomalous diffusion. Classical model treats population as homogeneous — FractaLPK reveals critical heterogeneity in pediatric drug transport. Key insight: mean nfrac ≈ 1.0 masks individual anomalous behavior ranging from 0.518 to 2.348.
Amiodarone
AntiarrhythmicOral / IVAdults
Classical Model
Compartments: 2
Half-life: 40–55 days
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.587
k21,f: 0.48 day−α
α = 0.587 ★★★★★ Flagship drug
The foundational drug for fractional PK. Very long half-life explained by anomalous tissue redistribution (power-law return from deep compartment). Classical 2-compartment model cannot capture the 40–55 day terminal phase without fractional order.
Diazepam
BenzodiazepineIntravenousN=12 patients
Classical Model
Compartments: 3
Parameters: 7
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.54 (SE 0.017)
Parameters: 3
3-CMT → 1-CMT frac ★★★★★ 4 fewer params
Fractional 1-compartment model matches classical 3-compartment performance with 4 fewer parameters. First NONMEM-based fractional PopPK implementation (FDE4NONMEM). CV of α estimate = 3.15% — highly precise.
Diclofenac
NSAIDOralN=12 healthy volunteers
Classical Model
Compartments: 2
Absorption: first-order
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.60 – 0.93
Per subject: individual
α range 0.60–0.93 ★★★★ Subject-specific 75% anomalous
Wide inter-individual variability in fractional order: some subjects (Subject 8, α=1.0) follow classical kinetics while others (Subject 6, α=0.60) show strong anomalous absorption. Bioequivalence assessment benefits from individual α estimation.
Methotrexate
Antimetabolite (Oncology)IV InfusionN=43 children (ALL)
Classical Model
Compartments: 2
Fails: non-monotonic C(t)
Fractal Model
nfrac: individual
Captures: local C maxima
Captures rebound ★★★★ Pediatric ALL
High-dose MTX (2–5 g/m²) in pediatric ALL shows non-monotonic concentration profiles (local maxima during elimination). Classical models cannot capture this. Fractional model recognizes all elimination patterns including rebound concentrations critical for toxicity monitoring.
Lopinavir/Ritonavir
HIV Protease InhibitorOralHIV patients, 4 conditions
Classical Model
Compartments: 2 + MM
Clearance: Michaelis-Menten
Fractal Model
nfrac: 0.50
Interaction: rifampin effect
α = 0.50 ★★★★ Validated on clinical data
Fractional model captures the complex nonlinear PK of lopinavir including drug-drug interaction with rifampin (TB co-treatment). Fixed α=0.5 suggests strong subdiffusion in GI absorption. Critical for HIV/TB co-infected patients where classical models underpredict exposure.
Theophylline
BronchodilatorOral / IVN=12 (Lixoft reference)
Classical Model
Compartments: 1
OFV: baseline
Fractal Model
nfrac: ~0.95
ΔOFV: not significant
0/12 significant ☆☆☆☆☆ Negative control
Theophylline serves as a negative control: none of 12 subjects show significant fractional behavior. nfrac ≈ 0.95 (close to 1.0 = classical). This validates that FractaLPK does not over-fit — when data is classical, the engine correctly returns α ≈ 1.
Vancomycin NEGATIVE CONTROL
Glycopeptide AntibioticIntravenousN=50 (simulated ICU)
Classical Model
Compartments: 2
OFV: wins
Fractal Model
nfrac: not justified
ΔOFV: negative
Classical wins ☆☆☆☆☆ p = n.s.
Negative control. Vancomycin follows classical 2-compartment kinetics. Fractional model does not improve fit. This confirms FractaLPK does not over-fit — when classical diffusion applies, the engine correctly identifies it.
Tacrolimus NEGATIVE CONTROL
ImmunosuppressantOralN=40 (simulated transplant)
Classical Model
Compartments: 1 + oral abs
OFV: wins
Fractal Model
nfrac: not justified
ΔOFV: +0.3 (n.s.)
ΔOFV +0.3 ☆☆☆☆☆ p = 0.58 (n.s.)
Negative control. Tacrolimus high IIV is explained by classical covariates (CYP3A5 genotype, weight). Fractional order adds ΔOFV=0.3 (p=0.58, well below significance threshold of 3.84). Confirms the engine avoids false positives in drugs with high but classically-explained variability.
Docetaxel TUMOR DYNAMICS
Taxane chemotherapyIVN=18 patients, NSCLC (Benzekry 2022)
Classical Model (α=1)
Tumor growth: logistic ODE
Wins: 2/18 (11%)
Fractional Model (RPSM+Cp5)
αopt: 0.491
Wins: 16/18 (89%)
ΔMSE +22.8% ★★★★★ 89% fractional advantage
Strongest fractional advantage among 3 treatment arms. Docetaxel-treated NSCLC tumors show α=0.49, indicating strong subdiffusive dynamics. The fractional logistic model (Caputo DαT = rT(1-bT), solved by RPSM + Levin-U acceleration) reduces MSE by 22.8% vs classical. Tumor growth under cytotoxic chemotherapy exhibits memory effects consistent with heterogeneous tissue damage.
Atezolizumab TUMOR DYNAMICS
Anti-PD-L1 immunotherapyIVN=34 patients, NSCLC (Benzekry 2022)
Classical Model (α=1)
Tumor growth: logistic ODE
Wins: 7/34 (21%)
Fractional Model (RPSM+Cp5)
αopt: 0.547
Wins: 27/34 (79%)
ΔMSE +18.0% ★★★★★ 79% fractional advantage
Key finding: α not significantly different from docetaxel (p=0.46, Mann-Whitney). This suggests α is a tumor-intrinsic property, not treatment-dependent. The fractional order captures the inherent heterogeneity of NSCLC tissue architecture, regardless of whether the patient receives chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitor dynamics are equally subdiffusive (α=0.55).
Docetaxel + Atezolizumab TUMOR DYNAMICS
Chemo-immunotherapy comboIVN=8 patients, NSCLC (Benzekry 2022)
Classical Model (α=1)
Tumor growth: logistic ODE
Wins: 0/8 (0%)
Fractional Model (RPSM+Cp5)
αopt: 0.507
Wins: 8/8 (100%)
ΔMSE +16.1% ★★★★★ 100% fractional advantage
100% fractional advantage in combination chemo-immunotherapy. All 8 patients showed better fit with the fractional model (α=0.51). Combined treatment may induce even more heterogeneous tissue dynamics than monotherapy, though the small sample size warrants caution. This is the first demonstration of RPSM+Levin acceleration applied to clinical tumor dynamics data.
Lithium NEGATIVE CONTROL
Mood StabilizerOralN=35 (simulated)
Classical Model
Compartments: 1 + oral abs
OFV: wins
Fractal Model
nfrac: ~0.86 (n.s.)
ΔOFV: negative
Classical wins ☆☆☆☆☆ p = n.s.
Negative control. Lithium renal kinetics are well-described by classical models. Despite narrow therapeutic window, no anomalous diffusion detected. Note: real patient data (not available publicly) could show different results in elderly or renally impaired populations.

Summary Comparison

Drug ΔOFV nfrac % Anomalous Significance Source
Abacavir +342 ~1.000 40.2% ★★★★★ FractaLPK
Propofol +179.3 0.72 ★★★★★ FractaLPK
Amiodarone 0.587 ★★★★★ Dokoumetzidis 2010
Diazepam 0.54 ★★★★★ Kaikousidis 2023
Diclofenac 0.60–0.93 75% ★★★★ Popovic 2010
Lopinavir 0.50 ★★★★ Fractal Fract 2023
Methotrexate individual ★★★★ Popovic 2015
Anakinra +13.7 0.85 ★★★★ FractaLPK
Docetaxel (TUMOR) +22.8% MSE 0.491 89% ★★★★★ Benzekry 2022
Atezolizumab (TUMOR) +18.0% MSE 0.547 79% ★★★★★ Benzekry 2022
Doce+Atezo combo (TUMOR) +16.1% MSE 0.507 100% ★★★★★ Benzekry 2022
Theophylline n.s. ~0.95 0% ☆☆☆☆☆ Negative control
Vancomycin n.s. n/a 0% ☆☆☆☆☆ Negative control
Tacrolimus +0.3 n/a 0% ☆☆☆☆☆ Negative control
Lithium n.s. ~0.86 0% ☆☆☆☆☆ Negative control

Request an Analysis

Whether you are an academic researcher or a pharmaceutical company, we analyze any compound using the FractaLPK fractional engine.

Academic collaboration: free analysis of published datasets in exchange for co-authorship on resulting publications.

Industry and CRO: contact us with a brief description of your dataset and analysis objective. We will respond within 2 business days.

Academic collaboration → Industry pilot →